FilmSpooler

Analog Photography…Toy, Lomo and Vintage

Using 120 film in a Kodak Six-16 Brownie Junior

What Happened:

I was on Ebay, not too long ago, looking for any camera that was 1) affordable and 2) different from most of the analog cameras I’ve been buying.  I forgot what search words I used, but whatever it was, I ended up on a page with two Kodak Six-16 Brownie Juniors up for bid.   In the end, I ended paying around $25 for both of them, with shipping.

Kodak Six-16 Brownie Junior

When I got the cameras I realized where they got their names from.  They both use 616 film.  At first I thought that buying these cameras was a mistake, however, with help from Google, I found out there were ways to get 120 film to work in them.

Yay!

A Little Background:

Eastman Kodak came out with the Brownie Junior Six-16 in 1934, originally sold it for $2.75 and then discontinued it in 1942.

It’s 5″ tall, 3.25″ wide and 5.5″ deep.

The Six-16 used 616 film which was discontinued in 1984 in favor of 120 film.

There are two view finders on the Six-16; one on top for portrait shots and one one the side so you can take landscape shots.

f/Stops for both aperture settings are f/11 (tab down) and f/16 (tab up) and the shutter includes a bulb mode (tab out).

The metal frame, the 616 spool and the cardboard body covered in leatherette.

What To Do First:

First thing I did was clean decades worth of dust, dirt and contaminants on the mirrors and the lenses.  After unscrewing and removing the faceplate, I was able to access and cleaning the insides of the viewfinders and lenses.  I spruced up the mirrors and glass with a cotton swab and microfiber cloth.

These cameras were in really good shape.  The main frame is metal while the external body is made out of pretty thick cardboard.  Most of the camera was cleaned with a dry microfiber cloth and some patience.

Using 120 Film:

Fortunately, both cameras came with one empty 616 spool each, but still, I didn’t have any 616 film available.

Above 120 Film Spool, Below 616 Film Spool

I went online and I saw that folks were able to take pictures with the Six-16 using 12o film rolls, however the 120 spools are shorter and have thicker stems.  After realizing that I just needed some spacers, I started tinkering around with washers and coins.  Eventually, I found that a couple of taped quarters on both ends of the 120 film spools make great spacers.  In the end, the quarters trick worked, but only on the film spool side of the camera.  The take-up side has a piece of knob that fits in the 616 spool, so using quarters would block the knob from doing it’s job.

Put the quarters on the film spool side at the top of the camera and 616 spool in the take-up section at the bottom.

Because of the large exposures being taken, and especially for the first frame, I loaded the film in the dark so that parts of the picture (frames 1 and 2) wouldn’t get any light.   As for frame counting on the 120 film, I shot at every three frames giving me five pictures total.  The order was 3, 6, 9, 12 and  15 .

After shooting all your film, go back to the darkroom and roll the film back to the 120 spool and take it to get developed.  I say to do this because 616 film spools are hard to find and you wouldn’t want to accidentally give away such an important piece of hardware to your photo developer.

The Test Run:

Here are a few pictures I took with the Kodak Six-16 Brownie Junior on 120 film.  Not bad, eh?

Shoreline at Torrance Beach, CA

Sunset at Redondo Beach, CA

Fox Theater in Westwood, California

Filed under: Reviews, Tip, Vintage Camera, , , , , , , , , ,

My Lomokino Rig

Having fun with a new camera is great, but I really needed to find a way to get a better handle on a painful situation…(pun intended)

My Lomokino Rig

Hello Lomokino:

A few weeks ago, the Lomography store in LA had a Red Carpet Event party for their latest camera, the Lomokino Movie Maker.  Like the movie film cameras of old, the Lomokino shoots sequential frames with a manual wind of its take-up crank.  What’s neat, aside from being able to shoot a series of continuous frames, is that it uses 35mm film!  For just under $80, I saw it as a great buy that would be fun to try out.

The Lomokino

Throughout the party, the folks at the store were running around taking pictures of the event with Lomokinos in hand, but since it was night,  they used the Fritz the Blitz flash, cable and adapter to get their shots. I took notice of the way that they were holding the cameras and the flash while cranking away at the Lomokino and…it looked kind of uncomfortable.  I didn’t think much about it since we were having a lot of fun…so much fun, that I bought a La Sardina camera with the Fritz the Blitz flash and the optional adapter kit, to boot.

La Sardina - El Capitan Edition

The Problem:

The next day, I unboxed my Lomokino, loaded some film into it and started shooting around my apartment.  For the dark spots, I mounted the Lomokino on the Fritz the Blitz adapter and hooked up the camera to the flash unit.  I then set the flash to it’s lowest level and was able to get three to four lit frames off of one solid charge on the flash.  Using either of the two other higher settings on the flash sucks up the charge too fast and makes you wait for the next full re-charge.

Well, after about 5 or so minutes, my hands were getting tired.  The square shape of the Lomokino isn’t the most ergonomic design that Lomography has put out.  That, plus having to hold the adapter and Fritz the Blitz flash, as well, didn’t make things any easier either.  Then I remembered the Lomography staff and how they had to keep cranking away all night taking pictures of the event.  If they were in pain, they hid it well (or had plenty of breaks in between).

…and that’s when I went to Google…

The Parts:

Since I already had the Fritz the Blitz adapter, Flash and Lomokino camera, the only thing I was missing was a handle.  I figured that someone out there had a handle with a mount screw that would fit the adapter, so before I worried about any other little parts I had to find the right grip.

Once found and ordered, this is what I ended up needing to build out my “rig”:

  • One Barska Accu Grip Hand Held Mount – It’s contoured and shaped for a good solid grip and has a nice rubbery coating that’s easy to hold.

Barska Accu Grip Hand Held Mount

  • One Fritz the Blitz adapter kit – You’ll need the hot-shoe adapter cable and the adapter arm with the attached swivel for the flash.

Fritz the Blitz Apapter Kit

  • One #12-24 x 3/4″ machine screw and washer – Used to mount the Accu Grip in place.

#12-24 x 3/4" Machine Screw and Washer

  • One roll of black electric tape – You’ll be making two washers with the plastic tape.

Electrical Tape

Tools needed are:

  • One Phillips screwdriver – For screwing the handle to the adapter arm
  • One pair of scissors – Too cut the electrical tape without stretching it
  • One very pointy object – You’ll need to punch a pencil sized hole through electrical tape
  • One drill with a step bit – You may need this particular bit to widen the hole on the end of the adapter arm if you don’t have a thin file

The Solution:

Just so you can see the finished product before the assembly notes, here’s what I ended up getting:

The finished Lomokino assembly

The Good Stuff:

This whole assembly wasn’t built step-by-step; it was built by trial-and-error.  I’ll reference the different parts of the rig according to the picture below and give you a general idea of what I had to do to put it all together.

One thing first.  Since I didn’t have any rubber washers, I had to make my own out of the electrical tape.  Till I (or you) find just the right ones, do this…

Cut out a couple of three inch pieces of electrical tape from your roll and fold the first one over itself so that you have a square.  Do the same with the other, only fold it over itself with the sticky side up.  Now punch a pencil sized hole through the center of both of them.  You’ll need these “washers” for the assembly below.

* Note that three inches of the tape is not a definite.  You may have to add or remove tape till it’s the right thickness.  It all just depends on your folding skills…  🙂

  1. The handle has to be mounted upside down, which is fine.  The built in screw on the handle wasn’t long enough to reach through the provided hole at the end of the Fritz the Blitz adapter arm.
  2. Fortunately, the other end of the handle has a hole with the right sized threading with which you can use a #12-24 3/4 screw and washer to mount the handle.  You may have to widen the given hole in the adapter to fit the bolt.  If so, be sure to use the washer so the screw head doesn’t slip through.   Also, you’ll need that “sticky” washer we made and put it between the grip and the adapter arm.  The flexibility of the tape and the stickiness of its glue will keep the handle from spinning around while your shooting.
  3. The given knob that’s used to mount the camera on the Fritz the Blitz adapter arm doesn’t fit too well in the Lomokino.  It only goes in so far.  Without the right size spacer, the camera wobbles around.  This is where the second “non-sticky” washer helps out.  Just place the washer between the camera and the adapter arm and run the bolt through it.  You won’t need too many turns to tighten it, so be gentle.  You don’t want to strip the camera’s thread.
  4. Connect the hot-shoe end of the adapter cable to the Lomokino and plug the other end into the flash.

The Finish:

When all is done, adjust the handle so that it sits at a comfortable angle and give the screw and knob one more easy twist.  At this point you should be good to go.  Here’s what the finished rig should look like…

Positioning the camera and handle on the adapter arm this way gives me pretty decent balance as I turn the take-up crank and snap my pictures.  Also, my other hand is in a much more comfortable position as it doesn’t have to hold up the camera, the flash and the adapter arm at the same time.

Filed under: Analog Life, Reviews, Tip, , , , , ,

Scanning 35mm Film with Sprockets using VueScan and a CanoScan 9000F

One of the neat things about taking pictures with 35mm film is that you can shoot a picture and include the film’s sprockets in a frame.  It’s a nice effect and for the most part it adds a nice touch of character and personalization to your work.

The Cameras:

The set of Lomography brand cameras that I use for these “sprockety” pictures are the Diana F+ with it’s 35mm Back, the Spinner 360 and the Sprocket Rocket.

  • The Diana F+‘s 35mm Back is an optional attachment that let’s you easily load, use and unload 35mm film into the camera.  In order to get the sprockets into the picture, you need to install the largest of the included masks so that the image you’re capturing hits the entire area of the frame.

  • The Spinner 360 uses no mask and works out of the box.

  • The Sprocket Rocket is a wide angle, semi-panoramic camera that includes the sprockets in the picture by default.

The Film:

Nothing special here.  Any 35mm film will work.

The Scanning Mask:

I use the Lomography DigiLIZA 135 Film Scanning Mask for the “sprockety” effect.  It’s got the right dimensions and is pretty easy to use, especially sincet the Canon scanning mask that came with the CanoScan wasn’t designed wide enough to include the far edges of the film.

The Scanner:

I use a CanoScan 9000F for all my pictures.  I really didn’t try any other scanners because the CanoScan was highly recommended by the some of the camera shops I’ve visited.  For the most part, I’m happy with it.  Since I don’t pay for photo printing anymore and I scan all my developed film myself, I’ve definitely saved more than the $180 I paid for the scanner.

The Software:

I tried using the software that came with the CanoScan, but dumped it because there was only so much I could control.  So, after some browsing around, I saw a lot of good stuff about VueScan.  I downloaded an evaluation copy and ran it on my computer and it worked great.  It uses a tabbed interface that let’s me do a bunch of stuff that I wasn’t able to with the Canon software.  VueScan is definitely worth the $70 I eventually paid for it.

The Problem:

Early on, I started scanning pictures that didn’t have the sprocket in them.  Scanning these pictures was quick and easy, but trouble started to brew as I tried to scan some of my first pictures off of the Diana F+.   I would initially get a blue hue and no matter how many times I tried to fix this, the hue wouldn’t go away and the bright colors in the frame were not shining through.

Now, if I set the scanning mask handles and excluded all the dark parts of the picture, I could get all my colors, but I would also lose my sprocket holes.  That’s bad…

After some searching around the internet, I found some help.  However, not many people were using VueScan, so I contacted their support.  With the pieces I found online and the instructions from the VueScan tech, I was able to piece together a process that lets me scan my pictures with the sprockets holes and without the blue hue!

The Solution:

Here are the basic steps I use to scan my “sprockety” pictures.  I’m sure the procedure can be streamlined at some point, but it still works as is…and that’s what counts.

1.   After placing your masked film on your scanner and selecting the right settings, click the “Preview” button to get the initial scan.  You’ll initially get the blue hued scan…and that’s ok.

2.  Use the scanning mask handles and select the area of the picture between the sprockets and you’ll see the colors looking as you were expecting them to.

3.  Put a check in the “Lock Exposure” check box and click the “Preview” button again.

4.  Put a check in the “Lock Film Base Color” and expand the mask handles to include the sprocket holes.

5.  Press the “Scan” buttton to finally scan your colorful picture.

6.  Finally, the scanned picture will end up in the default folder set in your VueScan settings.

The Conclusion:

So that’s how I scan my “sprockety” pictures.  If I hear or find better ways of doing this, I’ll be sure to update this post.  For now, this is just the best way to go…

Filed under: Analog Life, Film, Tip, Toy Camera, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sticky Spools in my Holga 120N

I used to think that Fuji 120 film didn’t like my Holga 120N.  I was wrong…sorry Fuji.

Every once in a while, the turning of the film advance dial would get sticky and it would be really difficult to move to the next frame.  The further along I would go, the harder it would be to get to frame number 12.  I would eventually get to the last frame, but only after wrestling around a bit with the camera and working up a little sweat.  After all that work, the results after finishing that last shot were either the spooled film not being tightly wound around as it usually should or not being able to finish the roll as the dial was stuck beyond my mortal strength.  Either result usually ended up with my removing of the film from the camera and manually re-winding the film in the dark.

After some asking around and a little experimentation, I think I figured out what happened.

The issue with the loosely wound film was caused because of the missing foam pieces that are usually glued into the film spool compartents in the Holga 120N.  Without the spongy pressure that presses against the winding film, you get pockets of slack as the film is winding around the spool.  The uneven wind of the film would then put pressure against the chamber walls, making it hard to turn the take-up spool.  This can cause pretty bad light leaks (or good ones, if you’re lucky) once you expose the finished roll to light.

Here's a shot of where the missing foam should be. Gotta replace it for future, hassle-free, photo sessions.

The best way to fix this is to replace the foam with similarly sized pieces that are about 3/4″ to 1/2″ inch thick.

The second problem came up from my attempt to temporarily fix the missing foam issue.  I stuck a folded piece of cardboard under the new film spool to add resistence.  Problem was that the cardboard was a little too thick and as the film spool turned and turned, the piece of cardboard would wedge itself deeper under the spool.  In the end, the spool would get stuck and off to the dark room I went.

Here's the newly replaced folded paper sitting under an emptied spool. The piece before it was too thick and the new piece is half the original thickness.

The simple fix to this was to just use a thinner piece of cardboard…or even better, replace the foam with similarly sized pieces that are about 3/4″ to 1/2″ inch thick.

Here’s a shot I took that came from one of my loosely wound spools exposed to light…

The Metro station under Pershing Square in Los Angeles

It’s not too bad of a shot.  The light leak adds a little character to the picture.  What do you think?

Filed under: Analog Life, Tip, Toy Camera, , , , , ,